Global warming predictive models aren't worth a shit.

 Whom do you believe?   Nuccittelli or your lyin' eyes??

Environmental scientist Dana Nuccittelli accuses University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) atmospheric scientist John Christy of “manufacturing doubt about the accuracy of climate models” at a May 13 hearing before the House Natural Resources Committee. Nuccitelli claims Christy’s testimony “played rather fast and loose with the facts.” Those allegations are incorrect.

In my early days as an engineer, I used a lot of charts and correlations in my work.  Unfortunately, nowadays, many of these are "invisible" since they are embedded in computer code.  Because of this, there is a missing intuitive link where we don't get to visibly gauge the accuracy of numbers we use.

That is why this chart is so important.  We can visibly see and attest that the models are not only wrong or in error, but are utterly and completely useless in our decision making process.

“There Is No Climate Crisis”…1600 Scientists Worldwide, Nobel Prize Laureate Sign Declaration

 NOTRICKSZONE is a great resource on debunking the over-the-top shit we get from....whoever they are.

Looks like more and more are willing to put their names on paper stating that rising CO2 is not a crisis.

Here is the website that gathered the signatures

Here is the text of the petition.

Below are the bullet points of the declaration:

- Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming

- Warming is far slower than predicted

- Climate policy relies on inadequate models

- CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth

- Global warming has not increased natural disasters

- Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities

ALERT: This Portland Woman Won't Date You Unless You Suffer From Crippling Climate Anxiety

 At first, I thought this was a Babylon Bee stunt.  

What happened: Erica Berry, a female writer from Portland, Ore., announced in a New York Times guest essay that she brings up climate change "on first dates" and refuses to pursue relationships with men who don't share her obsessive thoughts and anxiety about global warming.

What she said: The author describes breaking up with her last boyfriend because he wasn't enthusiastic about having constant "conversations about our planet's future" and how local officials could "support vulnerable citizens through better infrastructure."

This just goes to show how the present narrative has struck fear into everyone.   Which also shows that if you say a lie long enough and loud enough people will believe it.

Fourth Anniversary: Retelling the story of the Hockey Stick Fraud

 I just thought it would be worth reminding people about this.  This was the pivotal historic moment when the blowhard Goliath was slain. He goes into battle full of haughtiness and empty words of threats, only to have his story fall apart, thus slain.

That was the destiny of Michael Mann. 

Some years ago, Dr. Tim Ball wrote that climate scientist Michael Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn State.” At issue was Mann’s famous “hockey stick” graph that purported to show a sudden and unprecedented 20th century warming trend. The hockey stick featured prominently in the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report (2001), but has since been shown to be wrong....

What happened was that Dr. Ball asserted a truth defense. He argued that the hockey stick was a deliberate fraud, something that could be proved if one had access to the data and calculations, in particular the R2 regression analysis, underlying it. Mann refused to produce these documents. He was ordered to produce them by the court and given a deadline. He still refused to produce them, so the court dismissed his case.

The rules of discovery provide that a litigant must make available to opposing parties documents that reasonably bear on the issues in the case. Here, it is absurd for Mann to sue Ball for libel, and then refuse to produce the documents that would have helped to show whether Ball’s statement about him–he belongs in the state pen–was true or false. The logical inference is that the R2 regression analysis and other materials, if produced, would have supported Ball’s claim that the hockey stick was a deliberate fraud on Mann’s part. 

The Face of Fear Mongering

This is the face of someone who wants you to constantly live in fear.

Global Greening by Dr Patrick Moore

 Great Patrick Moore youtube video discussing the "good gas" CO2.

 

Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Canceled after Declaring ‘Climate Crisis’ Narrative a Hoax

 How dare you speak agaist the Narrative???!! 

The world-renowned Nobel Prize-winning scientist Dr. John Clauser has become the latest target of a cancel campaign after he declared that the so-called “climate crisis” narrative is a hoax.

Clauser’s comments drew widespread attention following recent reporting from Slay News.

Clauser, the co-winner of the 2022 Nobel Physics prize and one the world’s leading authorities on quantum mechanics, spoke out to warn the public that the “climate crisis” narrative being pushed by the global elite and their allies in the corporate media is a hoax.

He blasted “climate emergency” claims as a “dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.”

Clauser, who was also awarded the 2010 Wolf Prize in Physics, the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel, warns that misguided climate science is a hoax that is being driven by “massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.”

 And why did he speak out so forcefully against the "Extreme Climate Boiling" crowd? 

Because Dr. Clouser has nothing to lose. He's made his permanent mark in the Physics Space and really doesn't give a shit what you think of him. The younger science crowd who wholeheartedly agree with him don't dare say anything knowing that if they go against the Narrative, they will be summarily fired. You can't pay your mortgage or send your kids to private school with zero income.